Home » Reading » B2 English Reading Practice Tests » Tourism and Its Impact on Local Communities B2 Reading Practice Tests Rules & Examples

Tourism and Its Impact on Local Communities B2 Reading Practice Tests Rules & Examples

📖Reading Passage (B2)

Read the passage carefully before attempting Exercise 1 (Multiple Choice) and Exercise 2 (Fill in the blanks dropdown) below.

Walk through the narrow cobblestone streets of Kotor, Montenegro, on a summer morning, and you will find yourself weaving between tour groups, souvenir stalls, and long queues outside every café. Locals hurrying to work squeeze past visitors who stop without warning to photograph ancient walls. This daily friction is a familiar story in dozens of towns and cities across Europe, and it raises a question that community leaders, environmentalists, and economists have been debating for years: is tourism doing more harm than good?

There is no doubt that tourism has transformed the economies of many regions that previously had little to offer in terms of industry or employment. In coastal towns across Croatia, Greece, and Portugal, hospitality has created thousands of jobs and generated revenue that funds public services, road improvements, and cultural preservation. Local artisans who might otherwise have struggled to sell handmade goods now have a global market walking directly to their doorsteps. Furthermore, increased tourism often encourages governments to invest in infrastructure — better transport links, cleaner streets, and improved healthcare facilities — that benefits residents and visitors alike.

Nevertheless, the picture is considerably more complicated. In cities such as Barcelona and Amsterdam, residents have grown increasingly frustrated with what has been called “overtourism” — a situation in which the sheer volume of visitors overwhelms a place and gradually erodes the quality of life for those who call it home. Rents rise sharply as landlords convert apartments into short-term holiday lets, pushing long-term residents out of neighbourhoods their families have occupied for generations. Traditional local businesses, which cannot compete with tourist-facing cafés and gift shops charging inflated prices, are forced to close. In some cases, the very cultural authenticity that attracted tourists in the first place begins to disappear, replaced by a commercialised version of local identity designed purely to appeal to outsiders.

Having recognised these patterns, some communities are beginning to push back. Authorities in Dubrovnik have introduced strict visitor limits, whereas Amsterdam has banned the construction of new hotels in the city centre. Venice has experimented with an entry fee for day-trippers, a controversial measure that supporters argue is essential for protecting the city’s fragile environment and heritage. What these approaches share is the idea that sustainable tourism — carefully managed and genuinely beneficial to local people — requires deliberate intervention rather than simply allowing market forces to take over.

The debate is unlikely to be resolved easily, partly because tourism is rarely straightforward. A policy that works brilliantly for one community might prove disastrous for another. What seems clear, however, is that the days of treating tourism as an unconditional economic blessing are over. Local voices must be heard, and the needs of residents must be placed at the centre of any plan for the future. After all, a destination without a thriving community is little more than a theme park — and theme parks, eventually, lose their appeal.

Exercise 1

Read the passage about tourism and its impact on local communities carefully, then choose the correct answer for each question based on the information in the text.

Example: According to the passage, what is one economic benefit of tourism for local communities?
Answer: Tourism creates jobs and generates income for local businesses and residents.

1. What is the main purpose of this passage?
2. According to the passage, which of the following is a direct economic benefit of tourism mentioned by the writer?
3. The writer uses the example of Kotor, Montenegro, in the opening paragraph mainly to illustrate what?
4. According to the passage, what is one reason why traditional local businesses in overtouristed cities are forced to close?
5. What does the writer mean by the phrase 'overtourism' as used in the passage?
6. According to the passage, what has happened to housing in cities suffering from overtourism?
7. What approach has Amsterdam taken to manage the impact of overtourism, according to the passage?
8. What is the writer's attitude towards Venice's entry fee for day-trippers?
9. What can be inferred from the writer's statement that 'a destination without a thriving community is little more than a theme park'?
10. Which of the following best describes the writer's overall conclusion about the future of tourism?